- Growth Elements
- Posts
- Beyond CAC & LTV: The New SaaS Efficiency Metrics VCs Actually Care About in 2025
Beyond CAC & LTV: The New SaaS Efficiency Metrics VCs Actually Care About in 2025
Read time: 3 minutes.
Welcome to the 137th edition of The Growth Elements Newsletter. Every Monday and sometimes on Thursday, I write an essay on growth metrics & experiments and business case studies.
Today’s piece is for 8,000+ founders, operators, and leaders from businesses such as Shopify, Google, Hubspot, Zoho, Freshworks, Servcorp, Zomato, Postman, Razorpay and Zoom.
Today’s The Growth Elements (TGE) is brought to you by:
Finally, a powerful CRM—made simple.
Attio is the AI-native CRM built to scale your company from seed stage to category leader. Powerful, flexible, and intuitive to use, Attio is the CRM for the next-generation of teams.
Sync your email and calendar, and Attio instantly builds your CRM—enriching every company, contact, and interaction with actionable insights in seconds.
With Attio, AI isn’t just a feature—it’s the foundation.
Instantly find and route leads with research agents
Get real-time AI insights during customer conversations
Build AI automations for your most complex workflows
Join fast growing teams like Flatfile, Replicate, Modal, and more.
Thank you for supporting our sponsors, who keep this newsletter free.
SaaS founders continue to discuss CAC, LTV, and MRR.
But most top-tier investors have moved on.
Efficiency in 2025 isn’t just a finance KPI. It’s a survival metric.
Why Legacy Metrics Are No Longer Enough
CAC is often blended across channels, hiding inefficiencies
LTV is forward-looking and vulnerable to churn assumptions
MRR doesn’t say how efficiently you’re scaling it
These are still useful. But they don’t answer a deeper question:
“Is your startup capital-efficient, segment by segment, motion by motion?”
The New Metrics That Actually Matter
Here’s what VCs, CFOs, and top operators are tracking now:
Metric | Why It Matters |
---|---|
Burn Multiple = Net Burn / Net New ARR | Shows how much $ you're spending to add $1 of revenue. Target: <1.5x for efficient SaaS. |
NRR by Segment | Not just NRR. But NRR split by ICP, deal size, and sales motion. Tells you where expansion actually lives. |
Sales Efficiency per Rep | ARR per AE per quarter. If reps aren't >3-4x cost, it breaks. |
Payback Period (by Channel) | Don’t average this. SEO vs outbound vs. paid needs to be tracked in silos. |
Revenue per Employee (RPE) | World class benchmark: $300K+ for growth-stage SaaS. Closer to $500K in efficient teams. |
Operator Insight: What We’re Tracking Inside My SaaS Stack
Across my advisory portfolio, we’ve shifted reporting cadence to focus on:
Burn Multiple updates monthly (with ARR attribution by motion)
RPE + role-specific output tracking (especially marketing & CS)
Channel-level payback, not just blended CAC
NRR sliced by segment, not just total
Why?
Because these metrics don’t just reflect performance.
They expose where your GTM machine is leaking money.
Final Take
If your dashboard still leads with CAC:LTV ratio and ARR growth.
You’re 18 months behind.
The most capital-efficient SaaS teams in 2025 are tracking:
Burn vs ARR by channel
Revenue per operator seat
Expansion by customer type
Sales ROI per motion
Growth is no longer enough. It needs to come with math that survives a boardroom.
That's it for today's article! I hope you found this essay insightful.
Wishing you a productive week ahead!
I always appreciate you reading.
Thanks,
Chintankumar Maisuria