• Growth Elements
  • Posts
  • CAC is a Lie: Why You Need a ‘Time-to-Margin’ Metric

CAC is a Lie: Why You Need a ‘Time-to-Margin’ Metric

In partnership with

Read time: 3 minutes.

Welcome to the 124th edition of The Growth Elements Newsletter. Every Monday and sometimes on Thursday, I write an essay on growth metrics & experiments and business case studies.

Today’s piece is for 8,000+ founders, operators, and leaders from businesses such as Shopify, Google, Hubspot, Zoho, Freshworks, Servcorp, Zomato, Postman, Razorpay and Zoom.

Today’s The Growth Elements (TGE) is brought to you by:

Top investors are buying this “unlisted” stock

When the team that co-founded Zillow and grew it into a $16B real estate leader starts a new company, investors notice. That’s why top firms like SoftBank invested in Pacaso.

Disrupting the real estate industry once again, Pacaso’s streamlined platform offers co-ownership of premier properties – revamping a $1.3T market.

By handing keys to 2,000+ happy homeowners, Pacaso has already made $110m+ in gross profits.

Now, after 41% gross profit growth last year, they recently reserved the Nasdaq ticker PCSO. But the real opportunity is now, at the unlisted stage.

Until May 29, you can join Pacaso as an investor for just $2.80/share.

This is a paid advertisement for Pacaso’s Regulation A offering. Please read the offering circular at invest.pacaso.com. Reserving a ticker symbol is not a guarantee that the company will go public. Listing on the NASDAQ is subject to approvals. Under Regulation A+, a company has the ability to change its share price by up to 20%, without requalifying the offering with the SEC.

Focus on growth. We’ll handle the website.

OneNine gives you a dedicated team to design, develop, update, and manage your website. We handle everything on your existing site. There are no language barriers and no time zone differences. You can even live track all work in real time. If your website matters, partner with someone who cares.

Thank you for supporting our sponsors, who keep this newsletter free.

CAC is worshipped in SaaS. But CAC without context is a vanity metric.
It tells you how much it cost to get a customer.
Not whether that customer ever made you money.

That’s why I stopped asking, “What’s your CAC?”
And started asking: “How long does it take to make a margin on this customer?”

Here’s what most teams miss:

[1] CAC only tells you about the start of the journey.

You spend $300 to acquire a user. Great.
But then:

  • Their onboarding takes 14 days

  • Their first invoice is $29

  • Their support usage spikes

  • They churn within 6 months

Congratulations, you acquired a loss.

[2] Payback period is closer. But still not enough.

Yes, payback tells you when your CAC is earned back.
But that’s gross, not net.
And it doesn’t show when the customer becomes contribution positive.

You know what matters more?

Time-to-Margin:
How long does it take for a customer to pay back CAC, COGS, and ops overhead, and actually start generating net cash?

[3] Most SaaS teams are still measuring CAC like it’s 2018.

The real levers today:

  • Free-to-paid lag time

  • Onboarding cost per user

  • Support cost per segment

  • Time to cross-sell or upsell

  • Margin per account by cohort

A $150 CAC might be great…
Until you realise that the user costs $180 to support in month one.

CAC is a cost center metric. But Time-to-Margin tells you when a customer actually starts printing profit.

[4] Let’s borrow from HubSpot’s early freemium motion

  • CAC was extremely low due to organic traffic.

  • But their onboarding lag was long, and customer support costs were high.

  • Until they redesigned onboarding to get users publishing in <3 days, CAC payback didn’t guarantee margin-positive cohorts.

Lesson: Great CAC on paper. Losses on the P&L.

[5] Look at Superhuman’s onboarding model

  • High CAC due to white-glove setup.

  • But their users convert at a premium price with minimal churn.

  • Because the TTV is <15 minutes and margins are strong, they hit net contribution quickly.

Lesson: High CAC is fine if Time-to-Margin is fast.

[6] Contrast with Freshworks’ pre-IPO CAC issues

  • High ad spend + weak upsell motion = slow CAC recovery.

  • Public markets penalised them not for CAC, but for weak margin velocity.

Lesson: VCs tolerated CAC. Wall Street didn’t.

Reframe

CAC without context = vanity.
Time-to-Margin = strategy.

Takeaway

CAC is a number.
Time-to-Margin is a strategy.

Don’t just acquire customers.
Acquire profit as fast as possible.

That's it for today's article! I hope you found this essay insightful.

Wishing you a productive week ahead!

I always appreciate you reading.

Thanks,
Chintankumar Maisuria