• Growth Elements
  • Posts
  • How Revolut Built 20 Revenue Streams Without Pivoting Once

How Revolut Built 20 Revenue Streams Without Pivoting Once

Read time: 3 minutes.

Welcome to the 118th edition of The Growth Elements Newsletter. Every Monday and sometimes on Thursday, I write an essay on growth metrics & experiments and business case studies.

Today’s piece is for 8,000+ founders, operators, and leaders from businesses such as Shopify, Google, Hubspot, Zoho, Freshworks, Servcorp, Zomato, Postman, Razorpay and Zoom.

Today’s The Growth Elements (TGE) is brought to you by:

Discover the ROI of Data-Driven Out-of-Home Ads with OneScreen

Companies using out-of-home advertising have seen monthly revenue increase by more than 50%.

Brand marketing is having its moment, and OOH ads are the most powerful medium to make a statement, telling your brand story in the real world.

See how OOH delivers on your overall marketing ROI.

Thank you for supporting our sponsors, who keep this newsletter free.

Most SaaS companies burn out trying to find a second act.
Revolut never needed one.

From prepaid debit cards to trading, insurance, and payroll - Revolut added 20+ monetisable features in under 7 years.
Not by pivoting. Not by “launching verticals.”
But by stacking products on top of one clear utility layer.

Here’s how it worked and what SaaS operators can steal:

[1] Start With a Utility, Not a Category

Revolut didn’t pitch itself as a “neobank” in 2015.
It pitched a simple problem: avoid FX fees abroad.

The product was dead simple:

  • Load cash

  • Use the card

  • Save 2–3% on every trip

That one feature was enough to:

  • Go viral among early adopters

  • Anchor users to the app

  • Build trust in handling money

SaaS equivalent: solve one problem that happens 10x a week, not one that sounds strategic.

[2] Monetisation Was Layered, Not Rushed

Revolut didn’t monetise all at once.
Instead, it introduced new paid features only when usage deepened:

  • FX → Travel insurance

  • Card usage → Virtual cards, crypto

  • Wealth features → Stocks, savings vaults

  • Power users → Premium & Metal tiers

Each new product expanded LTV without creating separate products or funnels.

SaaS parallel:
Stop launching new SKUs to grow.
Instead, ask: what else does your most active cohort need that only you can provide?

[3] The UX Stack Stayed Unified

Despite 20+ revenue streams, Revolut never fragmented the product.

Why?

  • All features lived in one UX framework

  • Navigation remained consistent across tools

  • Everything stayed under one brand, one app, one support layer

The user never felt the company structure. Only the product simplicity.

SaaS parallel:
More features ≠ more friction, if they share the same mental model and interface logic rather than Add-on modules.

Final Operator Takeaways

  • Start with a utility hook: make the first habit easy and frequent

  • Stack monetisation over time, tied to actual usage, not roadmap pressure

  • Keep the product unified: new features should compound trust, not confuse it

Revolut didn’t grow by building 20 businesses.
It grew by building one interface that solved 20+ problems over time.

That's it for today's article! I hope you found this essay insightful.

Wishing you a productive week ahead!

I always appreciate you reading.

Thanks,
Chintankumar Maisuria