- Growth Elements
- Posts
- How We’re Operationalising NRR: Turning Retention Into a Revenue Engine
How We’re Operationalising NRR: Turning Retention Into a Revenue Engine
Read time: 3 minutes.
Welcome to the 112th edition of The Growth Elements Newsletter. Every Monday and sometimes on Thursday, I write an essay on growth metrics & experiments and business case studies.
Today’s piece is for 8,000+ founders, operators, and leaders from businesses such as Shopify, Google, Hubspot, Zoho, Freshworks, Servcorp, Zomato, Postman, Razorpay and Zoom.
Today’s The Growth Elements is brought to you by:
Wistia analyzed millions of videos so you don’t have to
Wistia, a leading video marketing platform for businesses, just released their fifth annual State of Video Report. The report, based on insights from over 14 million videos, and 100,000 businesses, brings you the latest video tips, trends, and insights. Download a copy to…
See how your videos perform against industry benchmarks
Learn which kinds of videos get the most engagement so you can make more of them
Find out how to scale your video strategy for less $$ with AI
Plus, it’s actually fun to read. How many reports can you say that about?
Thank you for supporting our sponsors, who keep this newsletter free.
Everyone says Net Revenue Retention (NRR) is a priority.
But very few treat it as a system, not just a metric.
We’ve started operationalising NRR across the business - not as a post-sales target, but as a shared accountability across Sales, CS, Product, and Marketing.
This isn’t fully done. We’re still evolving it.
But here’s the structure we’re building in real time—and what we’re learning as we go.
Why NRR Is Now a Primary GTM Metric
CAC is rising. CAC payback windows are stretching.
New business is still important but profitable SaaS in 2025 is driven by expansion, stickiness, and retention.
NRR is the cleanest proxy for whether your product is actually delivering ongoing value.
The truth: a 130% NRR can cover a lot of mistakes in acquisition.
But a 70% NRR will break even the best top-of-funnel machine.
So we made a decision:
NRR is no longer just a CS metric - it’s a business-level KPI.
Where We Started
Our earlier approach was typical:
CS teams handled renewals
Sales was focused on closing
Product was shipping roadmap items
Churn was reviewed monthly, but not actioned fast enough
Expansion was reactive, not systematic
Everyone agreed NRR mattered.
But no one owned it together.
How We’re Operationalising It
[1] Expansion Starts Pre-Sale
We rewired our ICP to include accounts with high expansion potential (multi-seat, recurring workflows, PLG-fit).
Sales now qualifies for expansion signals, not just close probability.
→ We price and position to win expansion from Day 1.
→ Multi-seat accounts are now the default motion.
[2] Product Builds for Stickiness, Not Features
Our roadmap is now tied to activation and retention metrics:
We prioritised Inbox v2 (Unified), onboarding flows, and account-level usage reporting
Every feature we ship must tie back to revenue retention or expansion enablement
→ Features that reduce churn or unlock upsells take priority
→ Weekly activation and “time-to-first-value” metrics now drive sprints
[3] Customer Success Owns Expansion Triggers
We’re layering in better tools and playbooks for CS:
Churn signal flags from usage patterns
Upsell nudges based on milestone completion
Seat expansion conversations embedded into QBRs and renewals
→ CS isn’t just defending revenue—they’re unlocking more of it
→ We treat expansion as a playbook, not luck
We’ve moved from siloed ownership to shared incentives:
Sales brings in expansion-fit deals
Product increases stickiness
CS expands account value
Marketing supports with use-case content and re-engagement loops
→ NRR is reviewed alongside ACV and CAC in our GTM reviews
→ It's not a lagging indicator—it’s a leading signal of business health
What We’re Still Solving For
This isn’t perfect.
There are still gaps in:
Real-time usage data surfaced to GTM teams
Automation around lifecycle triggers
Reporting visibility between Product, CS, and Sales
But the direction is right.
We’re not treating NRR as “something to fix after churn.”
We’re treating it as a system that starts before the deal is even closed.
Final Words
NRR is too important to be owned by one team
Expansion needs to be designed into your pricing, onboarding, and GTM
Retention is a lagging outcome - stickiness is the leading indicator
A 130% NRR company doesn’t need to grow faster - they grow smarter
We’re still building the system, but the shift is already compounding
That's it for today's article! I hope you found this essay insightful.
Wishing you a productive week ahead!
I always appreciate you reading.
Thanks,
Chintankumar Maisuria