• Growth Elements
  • Posts
  • IndieHacker Bubble: Why 90% Are Building for Each Other (Not Real Customers)

IndieHacker Bubble: Why 90% Are Building for Each Other (Not Real Customers)

In partnership with

Read time: 5 minutes.

Welcome to the 165th edition of The Growth Elements Newsletter. Every Monday and sometimes on Thursday, I write an essay on growth metrics & experiments and business case studies.

Today’s piece is for 8,000+ founders, operators, and leaders from businesses such as Shopify, Google, Hubspot, Zoho, Freshworks, Servcorp, Zomato, Razorpay and Zoom.

Today’s The Growth Elements (TGE) is brought to you by:

Smarter Marketing Starts Here

Most marketers waste money on channels that don’t actually drive results. The secret? Incrementality.

Our free ebook, Unlocking Incrementality: A Guide for Marketing Success, shows you how to measure what really moves the needle—so you can stop guessing and start scaling.

Inside, you’ll discover:

  • The difference between attribution and true incrementality

  • Proven testing methods to measure real impact

  • How to double down on the channels that actually work

  • Case studies from top brands already seeing outsized ROI

Don’t just run campaigns. Run campaigns that count.

Thank you for supporting our sponsors, who keep this newsletter free.

One of my connections messaged me yesterday: "I've built three SaaS tools this year. All got featured on Product Hunt. Combined MRR: $247. What am I doing wrong?"

Here's what: he's building for indie hackers, not real customers.

[1] Echo Chamber Problem

The indie hacker bubble is real:

  • 73% of "successful" indie hacker launches target other developers/founders

  • Twitter indie hacker community celebrates tools that solve Twitter indie hacker problems

  • Product Hunt becomes the validation metric instead of paying customers

Why does this kill growth?

  • Fellow indie hackers don't pay for tools; they build their own

  • The market size is tiny: 50K active indie hackers vs millions of real businesses

  • You're competing for attention, not solving real problems

[2] What's Actually Happening

Self-referential trap:

  • Build productivity tools for busy founders

  • Create marketing tools for other marketers

  • Design analytics dashboards for SaaS builders

  • Launch "all-in-one" platforms for indie hackers

Reality check from my operator work: Companies scaling from $500K to $5M ARR don't use indie hacker tools. They use enterprise software, hire agencies, or build internal solutions.

[3] Breaking Out: What Real Customers Want

Target businesses with budgets:

  • Mid-market companies ($10M-$500M revenue) have procurement processes and pay market rates

  • Industry-specific problems command premium pricing

  • Compliance, security, and integration requirements create switching costs

Focus on outcomes, not features:

  • Reduce manual work by X hours per week

  • Increase revenue by Y percentage

  • Decrease operational costs by Z amount

  • Measurable ROI within 30-90 days

Find customers who aren't on Twitter:

  • LinkedIn outreach to department heads

  • Industry conferences and trade shows

  • Cold email to companies experiencing specific problems

  • Referrals from existing customers (not other founders)

[4] Operator Framework for Real Customer Discovery

Step 1: Pick an industry, not a function

  • Healthcare practices need different tools than law firms

  • Manufacturing has unique workflows vs professional services

  • Vertical solutions command 3x higher pricing than horizontal tools

Step 2: Talk to people who write checks

  • Department heads with budgets

  • Operations managers with purchasing authority

  • CFOs who approve software spending

  • Not founders tweeting about productivity hacks

Step 3: Validate with money, not praise

  • Pre-sales before building

  • Paid pilots instead of free trials

  • Annual contracts, not monthly subscriptions

  • Revenue metrics, not vanity metrics

[5] What Winners Do Differently

They solve boring problems:

  • Compliance reporting for mid-market companies

  • Inventory management for growing retailers

  • Payroll processing for service businesses

  • Problems that hurt when unsolved

They charge real money:

  • $500-$5000 per month per customer

  • Annual contracts with implementation fees

  • Enterprise pricing that reflects business value

  • Customer success that drives expansion revenue

They build moats:

  • Data integration that's painful to replace

  • Workflow automation that becomes essential

  • Industry expertise that's hard to replicate

  • Customer success that drives referrals

Bottom Line:

Stop building for your Twitter feed. Start building for people with budgets.

The indie hacker community is a great place to learn and network. It's a terrible place to find customers.

Real businesses pay real money for real solutions. Find them where they work, not where they tweet.

That's it for today's article! I hope you found this essay insightful.

Wishing you a productive week ahead!

I always appreciate you reading.

Thanks,
Chintankumar Maisuria