• Growth Elements
  • Posts
  • The Hidden Cost of AI: Why Model Performance Is Outpacing Organizational Readiness

The Hidden Cost of AI: Why Model Performance Is Outpacing Organizational Readiness

Author

Chintankumar Maisuria
July 03, 2025

Read time: 3 minutes.

Welcome to the 134th edition of The Growth Elements Newsletter. Every Monday and sometimes on Thursday, I write an essay on growth metrics & experiments and business case studies.

Today’s piece is for 8,000+ founders, operators, and leaders from businesses such as Shopify, Google, Hubspot, Zoho, Freshworks, Servcorp, Zomato, Postman, Razorpay and Zoom.

Today’s The Growth Elements (TGE) is brought to you by:

Better headshot. Better outcomes.

Your headshot should work as hard as you do. InstaHeadshots helps you show up with credibility, confidence, and clarity—in just 5 minutes.

Thank you for supporting our sponsors, who keep this newsletter free.

Everyone’s shipping AI features.
Few are building the infrastructure to support them.

The real bottleneck in AI isn’t the models.
It’s the org that’s not ready to use them well.

AI Doesn’t Fail Because It’s Bad. It Fails Because It’s Untested, Unowned, and Unscoped.

Most teams assume AI = automation = efficiency.
But the second AI gets deployed into production, here’s what breaks:

[1] No QA Layer
- AI-generated output is sent directly to customers without oversight.
- Mismatched tone. Hallucinations. Broken brand voice.

[2] No Ownership
- Is it a Product? Ops? Engineering?
- Nobody owns performance, so nobody improves it.

[3] No Feedback Loops
There’s no system to track:
- What prompts worked
- What broke
- What the model learned (if anything)

Model Performance Is a Mirage If Org Performance Can’t Keep Up

You can have GPT-4 Turbo under the hood.
But if your team can’t run prompt QA, track user feedback, or measure impact?
It’s just another shiny wrapper.

High model performance + low team readiness = negative ROI.

What an AI-Ready Org Looks Like

The best operators aren’t just prompting better.

They’re building AI systems that live inside the org, with structure:

Layer

AI-Native Practice

Prompt Engineering

Templates, testing, and shared libraries

QA & Feedback

Human-in-the-loop review, eval sets

Ownership

Clear AI Ops function (not side-of-desk work)

Data Layer

Consistent tagging, context libraries, outcome tracking

Governance

What’s approved, regulated, and in production

Case in Point: What We’re Doing Inside My SaaS Stack

Across Salesflow and other projects:

  • AI content assistants have testing checklists and fallback logic.

  • We track GPT performance on outbound personalisation with quality scoring.

  • Internal documentation includes AI-generated SOPs, but they require human approval.

  • We’ve mapped “AI wrappers” by impact vs ownership risk.

The real unlock?
AI stops being a feature. It becomes a capability.

Final Words

If your models are strong but your org is fragile, AI will break things faster than you can fix them.

The winners in this next cycle won’t just have the best LLM.

They’ll have the best internal systems to use it.

Build the AI infra.
Design the QA layer.
Assign ownership.
Ship with confidence.

That’s the real AI advantage.

That's it for today's article! I hope you found this essay insightful.

Wishing you a productive week ahead!

I always appreciate you reading.

Thanks,
Chintankumar Maisuria